Wednesday, May 20, 2009 - 8:15 AM
358

The new look of the IDEC: Expanding the coverage area and remodeling the qualitative classes with more ecologically meaningful boundaries

Isabelle Lavoie1, Martine Grenier2, Stéphane Campeau1, and Peter J. Dillon3. (1) Geography, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351, boul. des Forges, Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC G9A 5H7, Canada, (2) Institut national de la recherche scientifique, Quebec City, QC G1K 9A9, Canada, (3) Environmental and Resource Studies, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, ON K9J 7B8, Canada

In 2006, the Eastern Canadian Diatom Index (IDEC: Indice Diatomées de l’Est du Canada) was developed to monitor the biological integrity of streams and rivers in Eastern Canada. The first version of the IDEC has been successfully used to evaluate the biological status of numerous sites. A new version of the index (IDEC 2.0) was recently developed to cover a lager geographic area, allowing for the inclusion of environmental conditions that were not well represented in the first version. Moreover, the approach used to define the biological interpretation of the index values was revised. Based on the first IDEC, the alteration gradient was divided into 5 equal classes reflecting qualitative levels of biological integrity. However, the limits between the classes were arbitrarily defined and lacked a meaningful biological consideration. The new IDEC 2.0 presents ecologically meaningful differences among biological communities (ecological thresholds or class boundaries) based on diatom biotypes, providing a more relevant interpretation of the diatom community changes along the alteration gradient. This approach, therefore, suggests more ecologically significant boundaries between qualitative classes, and reduces the subjectivity associated with arbitrarily and equally defined classes.


Web Page: diatoms, bioassessment, streams