96 The importance of direct and indirect denitrification as fates of nitrate in a forested stream

Tuesday, May 19, 2009: 8:45 AM
Ford Ballroom
Jonathan M. O'Brien , Kellogg Biological Station, Hickory Corners, MI
Stephen K. Hamilton , Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI
Y-K. Wang , Graduate Program of Environmental Ecology, National University of Tainan, Tainan City, Taiwan
Laura Podzikowski , Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI
Recent 15N tracing studies have highlighted the important role biotic assimilation plays in stream N retention, yet the fate of N following assimilation is not well understood. One potentially important fate is indirect denitrification, a process in which locally mineralized and nitrified N is denitrified before being exported to the water column. We conducted a series of in-situ chamber experiments in which patches of stream bottom were highly labeled with 15N to investigate the fate of assimilated N. We measured nitrate transformations, including uptake and denitrification, at the start of the experiment and continued to monitor dissolved N species (including N2) for isotopic enrichment in the patches over the next month. Direct denitrification (denitrification of nitrate from the water column) was an order of magnitude higher in cobble habitats than in sand habitats, accounting for ~26% and ~2% of nitrate uptake in cobble and sand, respectively. We detected slight enrichment of N2 gas in cobble and sand habitats, indication that indirect denitrification was taking place. However, preliminary estimates suggest that indirect denitrification only accounted for <0.1% of the assimilated N, suggesting that assimilation is only a short-term N retention mechanism.
See more of: Biogeochemistry II
See more of: Contributed Sessions