Thursday, May 21, 2009: 8:45 AM
Ambassador West
The role of agricultural streams in processing and retaining nutrients has been understudied considering the recent focus on how agriculture influences export of excess nitrogen to downstream ecosystems. Empirical measurements of nutrient spiraling in agricultural streams are few in contrast to “pristine” streams. Data from the LINXII project quantifying 15N-nitrate removal from streams of varying land use helps fill this knowledge gap. Combining data from 23 LINXII agricultural streams with a meta-analysis of 170 previously published nitrate uptake measurements, we found substantial variation in spiraling metrics among agricultural streams likely reflecting the variability in agriculture practices across sites. Uptake lengths (Sw) in agricultural streams spanned the entire range of those from the meta-analysis and nitrate Sw increased significantly with increasing discharge. The coefficient of variation in Sw was similar between LINXII and meta-analysis streams while nitrate concentrations were significantly higher in agricultural streams. Meta-analyses can identify major drivers controlling nutrient uptake. For example, we observed that agricultural practices resulting in stream channel exposure to sunlight, in an otherwise forested landscape, makes streams more "alive" (i.e. bioreactive). Effective stream management should optimize the capacity for nutrient uptake while recognizing that the type of agriculture may differentially influence potential nutrient retention.