Tuesday, May 27, 2008
345

Comparisons of invertebrate richness in terrestrial and aquatic envionments along riparian zones: Implications for river restoration?

S. Mark Nelson, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver Federal Center, Building 56, Rm 2010, 86-68220, P.O. Box 25007, Denver, CO 80225

River corridor restoration requires detection of deviations from desired conditions for monitoring improvements.  Assessment is difficult because of complexity at the interface of terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems and because of potential interdependence of ecosystems.  Terrestrial-aquatic linkage literature suggests the importance of floodplain environment to aquatic organisms and it is understood that altered flow regimes may negatively impact terrestrial arthropod communities.  It would seem that simultaneous study of aquatic and terrestrial indicators could be important in demonstrating project success.  The presence/absence of congruence between group biodiversity might suggest impact level and help monitor restoration.  A positive pattern in both groups implies an ideal restoration state, while lags in either group might suggest specific restoration alternatives.

 

The study of both butterfly and benthic invertebrates along a largely urbanized section of the San Diego River in California, USA provided information for monitoring enhancement efforts. It appeared that richness measures in the groups were positively correlated.  Historic gravel mining operations negatively impacted both biosurvey components, while sites that allowed for shallow, wide banks and lateral connectivity between the river and the floodplain increased richness metrics.  In this study, activities that reconnect the river and the floodplain would benefit both terrestrial and aquatic indicator groups.



Web Page: aquatic-terrestrial, riparian, biodiversity