Monday, May 26, 2008 - 3:45 PM
114

Changes in transient water storage and nutrient retention related to channel manipulations

Alba Argerich1, Eugènia Martí2, Roy Haggerty3, Francesc Sabater1, and Miquel Ribot2. (1) Departament d'Ecologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 645, Barcelona, 08028, Spain, (2) Limnology Group, Centre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CSIC), Accés a la Cala Sant Francesc 14, Blanes (Girona), 17300, Spain, (3) Department of Geosciences, Oregon State University, 104 Wilkinson Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331-5506

Quantification of water transient storage (As) has become critical in biogeochemical studies of stream ecosystems addressed to examine nutrient retention. It is expected that higher As may enhance interaction between nutrients and biota and thus, increase nutrient retention. However, results from literature are controversial. We hypothesize that besides the quantity of As, the quality or nature of it can also be a key factor influencing nutrient retention. In this study we tested our hypothesis by performing 16 constant rate additions of phosphate, ammonium, and chloride in 4 reaches of a semi-natural canal where we introduced 3 types of naturally colonized substrata packs (mud, sand and cobbles) to modify As. To assess nutrient retention, we estimated nutrient uptake rate (U) and the uptake coefficient and used the OTIS model to estimate As. At the end of the experiment, and to understand which type of substrata pack contributed more to nitrogen retention, we performed a 15NH4 addition. The introduction of substrata packs increased water residence time, decreased average water velocity and, in the case of “mud” packs, increased As. As we hypothesized, nutrient retention differed among treatments being the “cobble” treatment the one with highest U-PO4 and 15N signature.


Web Page: nutrient retention, transient water storage, hydraulics